1. Accusations of promoting division and neglecting federal spirit
Stalin has accused Modi of using rhetoric that “sows seeds of hatred every hour”, claiming the Prime Minister “has forgotten the dignity of the office” by engaging in what he calls “imaginary tales and bags of lies”.
The Indian Express
+1
He also alleged that Modi is trying to undermine the rights of states: “he is hell-bent on revoking them” (state autonomy) and that many policy decisions lean toward centralisation.
The Indian Express
In March 2025, Stalin wrote to Modi asking that any delimitation or redistribution of seats be based on the 1971 census only after 2026 — framing it as a matter of Tamil Nadu’s minimum expectation from the Union government.
Moneycontrol
2. Language, cultural and regional concerns
Stalin has objected to what he interprets as “Hindi imposition” and prioritisation of Hindi-language events in non-Hindi states. He asked Modi to recognise multilingualism and avoid giving Hindi a special place that might belittle other languages.
The Economic Times
+1
At a rally, he told Modi: “Focus on developing India rather than developing Hindi” — arguing that language imposition undermines regional identity.
The Times of India
3. Critiques of policy, funding and delivery for Tamil Nadu
Stalin has accused the Centre under Modi of unequal treatment of states: for example, in the Union Budget he claimed many states were excluded, and that the budget seemed aimed at “saving your government” rather than the nation.
The Economic Times
He has also specifically called out the withholding or delay of funds by the Centre for Tamil Nadu under central schemes and flagged this in letters to Modi (e.g., for education, metro rail).
The Indian Express
+1
4. Appeals and cooperation alongside criticism
While much of his commentary is critical, Stalin has also engaged in formal communication and appeals for cooperation:
For example, he has written to Modi requesting release of funds or addressing state-specific issues (fishermen’s rights, mango farmers, etc).
The Times of India
+1
Thus his relationship with the Union government is not purely adversarial — there is institutional engagement, even while highlighting differences.
5. Summary of tone and implications
In essence:
Stalin views Modi’s leadership as favouring centralisation, undermining states’ rights, and employing divisive political rhetoric.
He frames Tamil Nadu’s interests (linguistic, cultural, fiscal, developmental) as not sufficiently respected under the Modi‐led Centre.
At the same time, by writing formal letters and making demands, Stalin is signalling that Tamil Nadu expects its constitutional, fiscal and regional rights to be honoured — and is willing to publicly critique the Prime Minister when he believes they are not.
